PhantasmaCast

Ep. 46 - The Texas Chain Saw Massacre & The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2

This week, we are heading down to the Lone Star State to examine Tobe Hooper’s horrific double feature: The Texas Chain Saw Massacre (1974) and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 (1986).

These two films present a fascinating study in contrast. The 1974 original stands as a raw, sweat slicked signpost marking the rot of the post-Vietnam American dream, utilizing documentary style realism and oppressive texture to build unrelenting dread. Twelve years later, Hooper steered the concept into total madness with the 1986 sequel, turning the cannibalistic Sawyer family into a grotesque caricature of 1980s neoliberal consumerism, complete with neon lights, radio DJs, and a subterranean chainsaw battle.

We discuss how an artist handles their own legacy, shifting from raw visceral horror to satirical, slapstick splatter without losing the core thematic thread. Whether you prefer the sun-drenched nightmare of the original or the hyperactive, gore drenched spectacle of the sequel, both entries demonstrate what happens when a director refuses to repeat himself.

🎬 Movies Discussed

The Texas Chain Saw Massacre (1974, Dir. Tobe Hooper)

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 (1986, Dir. Tobe Hooper)

🕰️ Chapters

0:00 TCM Intro

1:10 Double Feature Pairing

8:50 The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974)

47:31 The Texas Chainsaw Massacre Part 2 (1986)

1:21:37 “What do you know about… TMNT?” (and other TCM movies)

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast

YouTube: https://youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/phantasmacast/id1745055694

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0eifTBsW1y8CkGQppn81Hp

💬 Join the Conversation

Do you prefer the gritty horror of the 1974 original, or the wildly satirical 1986 sequel? Let us know in the comments ☝️

Hosted on Acast. See https://acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week, we are going mad over Stuart Gordon's Re-Animator (1985) and From Beyond (1986).These aren't your typical cosmic horror stories; they are trashy, neon-soaked adaptations that dragged H.P. Lovecraft kicking and screaming into the zenith of '80s practical effects gore. We analyze how Lovecraft's deeply paranoid, insular worldview, coupled with his fear of the modern world and puritanical hang-ups, inadvertently created the template for cosmic terror. Then, we look at how Stuart Gordon took that unspeakable, abstract cosmic dread and dragged it onto the stage, soaking it in outrageous sexuality, body horror, and theatrical energy.

It is a double feature about the madness of scientific obsession, the horror of primal desire, and the low-budget ingenuity of mid-'80s horror filmmaking. Both films prove that '80s schlock and cosmic terror make the ultimate nightmare pairing.

🎬 Movies Discussed

Re-Animator (1985, Dir. Stuart Gordon)

From Beyond (1986, Dir. Stuart Gordon)

🕰️ Chapters

0:00 Intro

0:41 Welcome to PhantasmaCast OR H.P. Lovecraft was certainly...special

13:59 Today's Double Feature: Re-Animator & From Beyond

14:23 Re-Animator52:06 From Beyond

1:19:43 Final Thoughts OR The Guys Gush Over Barbara Crampton

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast

YouTube: https://youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/phantasmacast/id1745055694

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0eifTBsW1y8CkGQppn81Hp

💬 Join the Conversation

Do you prefer the mad scientist comedy of Re-Animator or the perverted body horror of From Beyond? Let us know in the comments.

Hosted on Acast. See https://acast.com/privacy for more information.

"The oldest and strongest emotion of mankind is fear, and the oldest and strongest kind of fear is fear of the unknown." - H.P. Lovecraft

This week, we board two late nineties sci-fi thrillers that dare to ask: what happens when human curiosity reaches beyond the edge of the known universe? We're watching Paul W. S. Anderson's Event Horizon (1997) and Barry Levinson's Sphere (1998), two films that take cosmic horror to its most claustrophobic extremes.

We look at how Event Horizon transforms a deep space rescue mission into a gory, hellish nightmare, while Sphere plunges deep beneath the Pacific Ocean to confront an entity that feeds on human paranoia. It is a double feature about the terror of isolated environments, the limits of human comprehension, and the madness waiting for us in the abyss.

🎬 Movies Discussed

Event Horizon (1997, Dir. Paul W. S. Anderson)

Sphere (1998, Dir. Barry Levinson)

🕰️ Chapters

0:00 Intro

0:58 Welcome back to PhantasmaCast 🎶

2:04 Cosmic Horror 101

16:00 Event Horizon

53:49 Sphere

1:19:48 Outro

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast

YouTube: https://youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/phantasmacast/id1745055694 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0eifTBsW1y8CkGQppn81Hp

💬 Join the Conversation

Are you taking the hell bound spaceship or diving to the bottom of the Pacific? Let us know in the comments.

Hosted on Acast. See https://acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ep. 43 - The Signal & Pontypool

This week, we are tuning in to the end of the world with David Bruckner, Dan Bush, and Jacob Gentry’s The Signal (2007) and Bruce McDonald’s Pontypool (2008).

Forget flesh-eating ghouls, late 2000s indie horror realized that our obsession with mass communication was the real threat. In The Signal, airwaves hijack human minds and spark immediate, bloody paranoia. In Pontypool, an isolated radio station becomes ground zero for a virus carried entirely through spoken language. We look at how both films ditch standard outbreak tropes to expose our terror of technological overload, proving that the scariest contagion isn't physical, it's the media we absorb every day.

🎬 Movies Discussed

The Signal (2007, Dir. David Bruckner, Dan Bush, Jacob Gentry)

Pontypool (2008, Dir. Bruce McDonald)

🕰️ Chapters

0:00 Intro

0:59 ...Zombies...

6:54 Double Feature Reveal

7:00 The Signal

49:45 Pontypool

1:27:28 Outro

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast

YouTube: https://youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/phantasmacast/id1745055694

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0eifTBsW1y8CkGQppn81Hp

💬 Join the Conversation

Do you prefer the multi-chapter, airwave-driven chaos of The Signal or the sound-booth claustrophobia of Pontypool? Let us know in the comments ☝️

#Pontypool #TheSignal #IndieHorror #ZombieCinema #FilmAnalysis

Hosted on Acast. See https://acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ep. 42 - The Great Escape & Escape from New York

This week, we are escaping into the worlds of two films video game auteur Hideo Kojima considers massive inspirations: John Sturges' The Great Escape (1963) and John Carpenter's Escape from New York (1981).

These classic escape thrillers provided the structural blueprint and antihero swagger for Kojima's gaming masterpiece Metal Gear Solid. We look at how The Great Escape defined high stakes stealth mechanics and tension on screen, while Snake Plissken's dystopian, punk rock cynicism birthed Solid Snake himself.

It is a double feature about cinematic cross-pollination, the evolution of antiheroes, and how obsession turns beloved media into groundbreaking art. Whether it is Steve McQueen jumping fences or Kurt Russell sneering at the government, both films prove that great video games owe everything to classic action cinema.

🎬 Movies Discussed

The Great Escape (1963, Dir. John Sturges)

Escape from New York (1981, Dir. John Carpenter)

🕰️ Chapters

0:00 Intro

0:40 So what KIND of double feature IS it???

1:40 Gamer Lore Dump aka "Why these movies for this month"

17:48 "The Great Escape" (1963)

40:23 "Escape from New York" (1981)

1:16:07 Outro

Final Thoughts

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast

YouTube: https://youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/phantasmacast/id1745055694

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0eifTBsW1y8CkGQppn81Hp

💬 Join the Conversation

Which cinematic escape artist defined your childhood: Steve McQueen's Hilts or Kurt Russell's Snake Plissken? Let us know in the comments.

#MetalGearSolid #EscapeFromNewYork #TheGreatEscape #HideoKojima #PhantasmaCast

Hosted on Acast. See https://acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ep. 32 - Ghost in the Shell & The Matrix

This week, we are plugging into the digital void with Mamoru Oshii’s Ghost in the Shell (1995) and the Wachowskis’ The Matrix (1999).

These prophetic cyberpunk cornerstones take radically different approaches to artificial intelligence and human identity. We look at how Ghost in the Shell questions the boundaries of the soul when humanity and technology converge, and how The Matrix flips that dynamic entirely. Instead of merging with machine intelligence, humanity created something that destroyed its world, leaving a future that might ultimately belong to the machines.

It is a double feature about digital existentialism, cybernetic anxiety, and the terrifying line between simulated realities and authentic selfhood. Whether it is Motoko Kusanagi questioning her own consciousness or Neo waking up in a pod, both films forced sci-fi cinema into a bold new era.

🎬 Movies Discussed

Ghost in the Shell (1995, Dir. Mamoru Oshii)

The Matrix (1999, Dir. Lana Wachowski, Lilly Wachowski)

🕰️ Chapters

0:00 Intro

2:15 The 90s Cyberpunk Boom

14:30 "Ghost in the Shell" (1995)

48:10 "The Matrix" (1999)

1:21:05 Final Thoughts

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast

YouTube: https://youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/phantasmacast/id1745055694

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0eifTBsW1y8CkGQppn81Hp

💬 Join the Conversation

Do you lean toward the cold, philosophical anime poetry of Ghost in the Shell or the high-octane simulated revolution of The Matrix? Let us know in the comments.

Hosted on Acast. See https://acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ep. 40 - Commando & Cobra

This week, we step onto the front lines of the legendary Stallone vs. Schwarzenegger arms race with Mark L. Lester’s Commando (1985) and George P. Cosmatos’s Cobra (1986).

The mid-1980s saw two mega-stars constantly trying to out-gun, out-muscle, and out-body-count each other, giving birth to a wildly specific archetype: the benevolent rogue. We trace how Reagan-era anxieties funneled straight into stories about one-man armies stepping up because the justice system lacks the nerve to finish the job.

It is a double feature about complete disregard for institutional authority, ridiculous firepower, and total narrative escalation. Whether John Matrix is delivering ice-cold one-liners while ripping apart an island army or Marion Cobretti is single-handedly taking down a fascist killer cult, both films prove that in 80s action cinema, subtlety was left at the door.

🎬 Movies Discussed

Commando (1985, Dir. Mark L. Lester)

Cobra (1986, Dir. George P. Cosmatos)

🕰️ Chapters

0:00 Intro

2:15 Stallone vs. Schwarzenegger Arms Race

11:19 "Commando" (1985)

40:24 "Cobra" (1986)

1:07:14 Final Thoughts

💿 Physical Media Shoutout

⁨@Arrow_Video⁩

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast

YouTube: https://youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/phantasmacast/id1745055694

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0eifTBsW1y8CkGQppn81Hp

💬 Join the Conversation

Do you prefer Arnold's relentless, log-carrying absurdity in Commando, or Sly's match-chewing, laser-sighted vigilante in Cobra? Let us know in the comments☝️

Hosted on Acast. See https://acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ep. 39 - RoboCop & Sorry to Bother You

This week, we are clocking in, selling out, and celebrating two masterpieces of cinematic satire: Paul Verhoeven’s RoboCop (1987) and Boots Riley’s Sorry to Bother You (2018).

These brilliant films weaponize pure, hilarious absurdity to attack corporate greed from opposite ends of the economic spectrum. We look at how RoboCop targets top-down privatization by turning public safety into a corporate playground, while Sorry to Bother You exposes bottom-up labor exploitation through forced identity shifts and surreal workplace horrors.

It is a devastating, brilliant double feature about how the modern economic machine attempts to claim total monopoly over our public infrastructure, our voices, and our literal bodies.

🎬 Movies Discussed

RoboCop (1987, Dir. Paul Verhoeven)

Sorry to Bother You (2018, Dir. Boots Riley)

0:00 Intro

1:26 Robocop

35:46 Sorry to Bother You

1:08:24 Outro, aka "C U Next Time..."

Original "Robo Wants an Oreo" clip via RoboCop Archive: https://youtu.be/BEhXAtFgNrk?si=sp51qptLLBg_ufC9

📀 Physical Media Shoutouts

Arrow Video

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast

YouTube: https://youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/phantasmacast/id1745055694

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0eifTBsW1y8CkGQppn81Hp

💬 Join the Conversation

Do you prefer the corporate, top-down satire of RoboCop or the surreal, worker-perspective madness of Sorry to Bother You? Let us know in the comments.

#RoboCop #SorryToBotherYou #BootsRiley #PaulVerhoeven #Satire

Hosted on Acast. See https://acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ep. 38 - Fade In & Catchfire

This week, we're facing our past regrets and disowned creations with Jud Taylor’s Fade In (1973) and Dennis Hopper’s Catchfire (1990).

These films represent the absolute limit of corporate interference, operating as flawed, compromised monuments to the nightmare of the studio system. We look at how Jud Taylor's western romance gets completely lost in translation, and how Dennis Hopper legally scrubs his identity from a star-studded thriller.

It is a double feature about the high cost of creative compromise, the fragility of structural conventions, and the remnants of pure authorship that persist under duress. Whether it is a studio executive altering a film beyond recognition or a director completely abandoning their own project, both films suggest that when commerce wins, the true story gets buried. 🎬

Movies Discussed

Fade In (1973, Dir. Alan Smithee / Jud Taylor)

Catchfire (1990, Dir. Alan Smithee / Dennis Hopper)

🕰️ Chapters

0:00 Intro

1:03 Who is "Alan Smithee"?

3:11 Fade In

24:45 Backtrack

57:33 Are these movies worth watching???

📀 Physical Media Shoutouts

@kinolorber

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast

YouTube: https://youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/phantasmacast/id1745055694 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0eifTBsW1y8CkGQppn81Hp

💬 Join the ConversationDo you think a studio-compromised film is still worth watching for the director's surviving ideas, or should Alan Smithee movies be left entirely in the vault? Let us know in the comments.

#AlanSmithee #FilmHistory #CinephileCulture #DennisHopper #PhysicalMedia

Hosted on Acast. See https://acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week, we are celebrating Pride by hitting the highway with a double showing of drag queen road movies: Stephan Elliott’s The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert (1994) and Beeban Kidron’s To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar (1995).

These films show that a road movie is about much more than getting from point A to point B. We look at how Tick’s journey in Priscilla allows him to shed the fear of being himself in front of his estranged son, anchoring the comedy with beautiful, independent vulnerability. On the flip side, we watch how the trio in To Wong Foo confront and dismantle their own preconceived notions about small-town communities as they embed themselves in middle America.

It is a double feature about identity, community, and self-discovery. Whether it is navigating the harsh Australian outback or transforming a forgotten town, both films suggest that the ultimate destination on a drag journey is finding the confidence within yourself to be yourself completely.

🎬 Movies Discussed

The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert (1994, Dir. Stephan Elliott)

To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar (1995, Dir. Beeban Kidron)

🕰️ Chapters

0:00 Intro

0:45 Favorite Road Movies

11:50 The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert (1994)

47:31 To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar (1995)

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast

YouTube: https://youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/phantasmacast/id1745055694 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0eifTBsW1y8CkGQppn81Hp

💬 Join the Conversation

Do you prefer the grounded, indie storytelling of Priscilla or the light-hearted studio energy of To Wong Foo? Let us know in the comments.

#PriscillaQueenOfTheDesert #ToWongFoo #DragCinema #RoadMovies #PhantasmaCast

Hosted on Acast. See https://acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ep. 36 - The Long Good Friday & Casino

This week, we are stepping into the halls of crumbling criminal empires with John Mackenzie’s The Long Good Friday (1980) and Martin Scorsese’s Casino (1995).

These films feature protagonists who operate as kings in their own respects, letting their massive egos blind them to the immediate threats right in front of their faces. We look at how Harold Shand’s dream of a legitimized London empire clashes with a political nightmare, and how Sam "Ace" Rothstein’s obsession with total control in Vegas ultimately creates his own downfall.

It is a double feature about the illusion of power, the volatility of the underworld, and the high cost of unchecked ambition. Whether it is the rainy streets of London or the blinding neon of the desert, both films show that a king is only as strong as the foundation he ignores. Plus, we dig into the incredible performances from Helen Mirren and Sharon Stone, who serve as the crucial anchors to these men of ambition.

🎬 Movies Discussed

The Long Good Friday (1980, Dir. John Mackenzie)

Casino (1995, Dir. Martin Scorsese)

🕰️ Chapters

0:00 Intro

0:45 Derek and Jake decide on their Top Scorsese picks

8:42 The Long Good Friday

36:08 Casino

1:05:11 Outro/Closing thoughts

📀 Physical Media Shoutouts

@criterioncollection

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast:

YouTube: https://youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/phantasmacast/id1745055694

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0eifTBsW1y8CkGQppn81Hp

💬 Join the Conversation

Do you prefer the gritty British realism of The Long Good Friday or the maximalist operatic tragedy of Casino? Let us know in the comments.

#TheLongGoodFriday #CasinoMovie #MartinScorsese #BritishCinema #NeoNoir

Hosted on Acast. See https://acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ep. 35 - Bad Lieutenant & Dragged Across Concrete

This week, we are looking at the law of the street with Abel Ferrara’s Bad Lieutenant (1992) and S. Craig Zahler’s Dragged Across Concrete (2018).

We explore "cops crashing out," looking at how these films handle officers who have completely abandoned the rulebook. Bad Lieutenant serves as a visceral redemption story, suggesting that even the most irredeemable, drug-addled soul can find a moment of spiritual clarity.

In contrast, Dragged Across Concrete functions as a pulpy reactionist fantasy. It presents a world of "white persecution" where the line between the badge and the mask is non-existent. We discuss how Zahler frames cops and criminals as two halves of the same coin, locked in a slow-burn cycle of suspicion and violence.

🎬 Movies Discussed

Bad Lieutenant (1992, Dir. Abel Ferrara)

Dragged Across Concrete (2018, Dir. S. Craig Zahler)

🕰️Chapters

0:00 Intro

2:34 Bad Lieutenant

38:39 Dragged Across Concrete

1:09:08 Conclusion or Final Thoughts Regarding "Morality in Media"

📀 Physical Media Shoutouts

@KinoLorber and @Lionsgate

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast

YouTube: youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: apple.co/phantasmacast

Spotify: spoti.fi/phantasmacast

💬 Join the Conversation

Does LT actually deserve redemption, or is Zahler's cynical worldview more realistic? Let us know in the comments.

#BadLieutenant #DraggedAcrossConcrete #AbelFerrara #SCraigZahler #Cinephile

Who is the ultimate "crash out" cop in your opinion?

Hosted on Acast. See https://acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week, we are walking the beat with Robert Altman’s The Long Goodbye (1973) and Shane Black’s The Nice Guys (2016).

These films represent two sides of the same tarnished coin. We look at Philip Marlowe as a relic of a moral code that simply does not apply to the world anymore. In The Long Goodbye, Marlowe is a ghost in his own life, stumbling through a cynical, hazy L.A. that has no room for his brand of loyalty. Contrast that with The Nice Guys, where our leads are trying to affect change against an overwhelming tide of corporate and political corruption, only to realize the deck is stacked against them.

It is a double feature about the failure of the private eye archetype. Whether it is the nihilistic malaise of the 70s or the frantic comedy of a modern action-noir, both films suggest that the truth does not set you free, it just makes you tired.

🎬 Movies Discussed

The Long Goodbye (1973, Dir. Robert Altman)

The Nice Guys (2016, Dir. Shane Black)

🕰️ Chapters

0:00 Intro

0:45 "95 KFM Home of PhantasmaCast"/Shane Black and Other Musings

10:19 The Long Goodbye

41:55 The Nice Guys

1:10:46 Outro or "Never Trust a Billionaire"

📀 Physical Media Shoutouts @KinoLorber and @WarnerArchive

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast

YouTube: https://youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/phantasmacast/id1745055694

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0eifTBsW1y8CkGQppn81Hp

💬 Join the Conversation

☝️ Does Philip Marlowe work better as a ghost in the machine or as a bumbling fixer trying to stay afloat? Let us know in the comments.

Hosted on Acast. See https://acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week, we are stepping into the Hollywood house of mirrors with Robert Altman’s The Player (1992) and Spike Jonze’s Adaptation (2002).

These aren't just movies about making movies; they are cynical, paranoid love letters to the nightmare of the creative process. We look at how Griffin Mill’s life in The Player becomes the very thriller he is trying to produce, and how Charlie Kaufman literally writes himself into a corner in Adaptation.

It is a double feature about the high cost of the "pitch," the absurdity of the studio system, and the paralyzing fear that you might just be a hack. Whether it is a studio executive getting away with murder or a screenwriter having a nervous breakdown on the page, both films suggest that in Hollywood, the story eventually consumes the storyteller.

🎬 Movies Discussed

The Player (1992, Dir. Robert Altman)

Adaptation (2002, Dir. Spike Jonze)

🕰️ Chapters

0:00 Intro

0:45 Favorite movies "about" movies

11:50 "The Player" (1992)

47:31 "Adaptation." (2002)

1:14:57 (very) Final Thoughts

📀 Physical Media Shoutouts

@criterioncollection and @ShoutFactoryVEVO

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast

YouTube: https://youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/phantasmacast/id1745055694

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0eifTBsW1y8CkGQppn81Hp

💬 Join the Conversation

Do you prefer the cynical Hollywood satire of The Player or the neurotic self reflection of Adaptation? Let us know in the comments.

Hosted on Acast. See https://acast.com/privacy for more information.

"When you stare into the abyss, does it also stare back?"

This week, Jake and Derek are obsessing over the "Auteur Procedural." We are pairing Bong Joon Ho’s 2003 masterpiece Memories of Murder with David Fincher’s 2007 magnum opus Zodiac. Both films are meticulously researched, deeply atmospheric, and focused on the cost of the chase rather than the identity of the killer.

We are looking at the nature of obsession through the lens of these intense investigations. These films mirror the fixations of their protagonists in the very way they were made, with David Fincher and Bong Joon Ho displaying an almost clinical level of research and technical precision. It is a look at how a search for the truth can consume everyone involved, from the detectives on the ground to the directors behind the camera.

0:00 Introduction

1:38 2 Certified Questions...

4:37 Content Warning: Films we discuss feature SA and true crimes

10:15 Memories of Murder (2003)

43:22 Zodiac (2007)

1:11:46 Wrap up/Final Thoughts

Join the Conversation:

Which of these films leaves you feeling more unsettled? Have you picked up the 4K restorations yet? Let us know in the comments!

Support the Show:

🍎 Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/phantasmacast/id1745055694

🟢 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0eifTBsW1y8CkGQppn81Hp?si=dc5901c049b3410e

📸 Instagram: @2certifiedbangers

🎥 TikTok: @2certifiedbangers

#PhantasmaCast #2CertifiedBangers #ZodiacMovie #MemoriesOfMurder #BongJoonHo #DavidFincher #PhysicalMedia #TrueCrimeCinema ☝️

Hosted on Acast. See https://acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week, we’re diving headfirst through multiple panes of glass with a pair of Certified Bangers: Police Story (1985) and Police Story 2 (1988).

We’re tracing Jackie Chan’s rise from stuntman to global action icon, and breaking down how he didn’t just star in these films, he built them from the ground up. Part director, part stuntman, but ALL star, Jackie crafts a completely unique auteur style rooted in precision choreography, bone-crunching physical comedy, and a drive to always stay ahead of the curve.

From gravity-defying mall showdowns to explosive set pieces that feel one missed step away from disaster, we’re talking about what makes these films tick... and why nobody else has ever quite done it like Jackie.

🎬 Movies Discussed

Police Story (1985, Dir. Jackie Chan)

Police Story 2 (1988, Dir. Jackie Chan)

🕰️ Chapters

00:00 – Intro & Certified Banger Check

00:00 – Jackie Chan: From Stuntman to Superstar

00:00 – Police Story breakdown

00:00 – Police Story 2 breakdown

00:00 – Stuntwork as authorship

00:00 – Final thoughts & pairing verdict

📀 Physical Media Shoutouts

Criterion

🎥 Watch With Us

If you haven’t seen these yet—fix that immediately. Then come back and let’s compare notes.

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast

YouTube: https://youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/phantasmacast/id1745055694

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0eifTBsW1y8CkGQppn81Hp

💬 Join the Conversation

Which Police Story hits harder for you? And what’s your favorite Jackie Chan stunt? Let us know in the comments.

Hosted on Acast. See https://acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week, we're unearthing the dark side of Aussie cinema. We tackle the terrifying Alison's Birthday (1981), a film fueled by the era's satanic panic anxieties. Then, get ready for the masterful slow-burn of Next of Kin (1982), a stunning blend of Giallo suspense and classic haunted house tropes where a nursing home hides deadly secrets.

Hosted on Acast. See https://acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week, we're watching Andrzej Zulawski's Possession (1981) and William Friedkin's Bug (2006), two movies that test the limits of love and madness. These films take the 'will they/won't they' trope to new heights by asking not whether our two leads will finally hook up, but rather: Will these two people kill each other by the time the credits roll?

Hosted on Acast. See https://acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week, we're plunging headfirst into the glorious trash bin of '80s independent horror with a double dose of cinematic absurdity: Troma's cult classic The Toxic Avenger (1984) and the wild, cannibalistic horror comedy Blood Diner (1987).

Hosted on Acast. See https://acast.com/privacy for more information.

Get ready for a double feature that will really mess with your head! This week, we're watching two films that are so good at challenging reality: Christopher Nolan's 2010 masterpiece Inception and Brandon Cronenberg's shocking 2020 body-swap thriller Possessor. We're talking dream heists and visceral sci-fi/horror—you won't want to miss it!

Hosted on Acast. See https://acast.com/privacy for more information.