Podcast

The Lead Podcast presented by Heart Rhythm Society

Courses, Education

The Lead – a weekly journal review podcast that is designed to keep you up to date and informed on the latest publications and hottest topics in electrophysiology. Key takeaways, in-depth interpretations, and informative interviews are all fitted into 15 minute time slots, so that they fit easily into your busy schedule. Click the link below to learn more!

Episodes
179
Releases
Weekly
Typical length
18 min
On air since
2023
Latest episode
5 days ago

Episodes

179 episodes, newest first

  1. The Lead Episode 175: A Discussion of Anticoagulation for AF with Intermediate Stroke Risk

    Season 4, Episode 175

    Show notes

    Description: In this episode of The Lead, recorded live at HRX 2026, host Melissa E. Middeldorp, MPH, PhD, FHRS, is joined by James Freeman, MD, MPH, MSci, and Rachel Schreier, MSN, ACNP, APRN, to discuss the recently published New England Journal of Medicine article "Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation with Intermediate Stroke Risk." The panel examines the findings of the SINGLE-AF trial, including the potential benefits of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with intermediate stroke risk, the study's low event rates and limitations, and the implications for individualized risk assessment, shared decision-making, and clinical practice.

    Learning Objectives:

    •

    Describe the design, patient population, and primary findings of the SINGLE-AF trial evaluating DOAC therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and intermediate stroke risk.

    •

    Evaluate the limitations of the SINGLE-AF trial, including low event rates, patient demographics, antiplatelet use, and the potential influence of atrial fibrillation burden and prior ablation.

    •

    Apply the trial findings to individualized anticoagulation decisions by considering stroke risk factors, bleeding risk, patient preferences, and shared decision-making.

    Host: Melissa E. Middeldorp, MPH, PhD, FHRS

    Guests: James Freeman, MD, MPH, MSci and Rachel Schreier, MSN, ACNP, APRN

    Disclosures:

    M. Middeldorp

    • Nothing to disclose

    J. Freeman

    • Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fees: Boston Scientific, Biosense Webster, Inc.
    • Membership on Advisory Committee: Medtronic, Pacemate
    • Research (Contracted Grants): American College of Cardiology, National Institutes for Health

    R. Schreier

    • Nothing to disclose

    Staff Disclosure(s) (note: HRS staff are NOT in control of educational content. Disclosures are provided solely for full transparency to the learner):

    S. Sailor: No relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies to disclose. M. Baldwin: No relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies to disclose.

    18 min
  2. The Lead Episode 174: A Discussion of The Forgotten History of Semi-Implanted Pacemakers

    Season 4, Episode 174

    Show notes

    Description: In this episode of The Lead, recorded live at HRX 2026, host Jason T. Jacobson, MD, FHRS, is joined by Michael S. Lloyd, MD, FHRS, and Igor R. Efimov, PhD, FHRS, to discuss the article "The Forgotten History of Semi-Implanted Radiofrequency and Inductively Powered Cardiac Pacing Systems," published in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology (PACE). The panel explores the evolution of early cardiac pacing technologies, the challenges associated with externally powered systems, and how historical innovations in wireless energy transfer may inform future developments in pacemaker design, miniaturization, and alternative power sources.

    Learning Objectives:

    •

    Describe the historical development of semi-implanted radiofrequency- and inductively powered cardiac pacing systems and their role in the evolution of pacemaker technology.

    •

    Compare the technical advantages and limitations of early externally powered pacing systems with fully implanted, battery-powered pacemakers.

    •

    Evaluate the potential applications of wireless energy transfer and alternative power sources in future cardiac pacing technologies.

    Host: Jason T. Jacobson, MD, FHRS | Westchester Med Center-New York Med Coll

    Guests: Michael S. Lloyd, MD, FHRS | Emory University Igor R. Efimov, PhD, FHRS | Northwestern University

    Faculty Disclosures:

    J. Jacobson

    • Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: Zoll Medical Corporation, Vektor Medical, Inc., CardioFocus, Inc., Abbott Medical, Johnson and Johnson
    • Stock Options-Privately Held: Atlas 5D

    M. Lloyd

    • Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: Medtronic
    • Membership on Advisory Committee: Boston Scientific, ABIM

    I. Efimov

    • Nothing to disclose

    Staff Disclosure(s) (note: HRS staff are NOT in control of educational content. Disclosures are provided solely for full transparency to the learner):

    S. Sailor: No relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies to disclose. M. Baldwin: No relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies to disclose.

    15 min
  3. The Lead Episode 173: A Discussion of AI Intelligence Enhanced ICM in Pediatric Patients: Effects on Device Performance and Clinical Workflows

    Season 4, Episode 173

    Show notes

    Description:

    In this episode of The Lead, host Lisa Roelle, PAC, Washington University in St. Louis, is joined by M. Cecilia Gonzalez Corcia, MD, MDCM, PhD, CEPS-P, Sainte-Justine, and John K. Triedman, MD, FHRS, Children's Hospital Boston, Cardiology, to discuss "Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Implantable Loop Recorders in Pediatric Patients: Effects on Device Performance and Clinical Workflow in a Single-Center Experience." The panel examines the potential for AI-based filtering to reduce nonactionable alerts and clinical workload associated with remote monitoring while considering pediatric-specific physiology, the limitations of extrapolating from adult data, and the need to preserve diagnostic sensitivity and clinical judgment when incorporating these technologies into pediatric electrophysiology practice.

    Learning Objectives:

    •

    Describe the effects of AI-based filtering on nonactionable alerts and clinical workflow in pediatric patients with implantable loop recorders.

    •

    Evaluate pediatric-specific physiologic and clinical factors that may influence the performance of AI-based arrhythmia detection algorithms.

    •

    Assess the benefits and limitations of incorporating AI-enhanced remote monitoring into pediatric electrophysiology practice while maintaining diagnostic sensitivity and appropriate clinical oversight.

    Host: Lisa Roelle, PA-C

    Guests: John K. Triedman, MD, FHRS and M. Cecilia Gonzalez Corcia, MD, MDCM, PhD, CEPS-P

    Faculty Disclosures:

    All relevant financial relationships have been mitigated. Host and Contributor Disclosure(s): L. Roelle

    • Nothing to disclose

    J. Triedman

    • Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fees: Biosense Webster, Inc.
    • Royalty Income: UpToDate, Inc.

    M. C. Gonzalez Corcia

    • Nothing to disclose

    14 min
  4. The Lead Episode 172: A Discussion of Integrated Care Management and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Using a mHeath-based approach in older multimorbid patients with atrial fibrillation: the…

    Season 4, Episode 172

    Show notes

    In this episode of The Lead, host Melissa E. Middeldorp, MPH, PhD, FHRS, is joined by David J. Slotwiner, MD, FHRS, and Alessandra Pina, MBBS, MD, to discuss "Integrated Care Management and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Using an mHealth-Based Approach in Older Multimorbid Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The AFFIRMO Cluster Randomised Trial." The panel examines the trial's evaluation of an mHealth-based integrated care approach for older patients with atrial fibrillation and comorbidities, exploring its neutral effect on hospitalization, challenges with patient engagement, characteristics of the study population, and implications for developing and implementing digital health interventions.

    Learning Objectives:

    •

    Describe the design, patient population, integrated care intervention, and clinical outcomes of the AFFIRMO cluster randomized trial.

    •

    Evaluate factors that may have contributed to the trial's neutral primary outcome, including characteristics of the study population, baseline management of atrial fibrillation, and patient engagement with the mHealth intervention.

    •

    Assess the opportunities and challenges associated with using mHealth tools to support integrated atrial fibrillation and comorbidity management in older adults.

    Podcast Contributors

    Host: Melissa E. Middeldorp, MPH, PhD, FHRS

    Guests: David J. Slotwiner, MD, FHRS and Alessandra Pina, MBBS, MD

    All relevant financial relationships have been mitigated. Host and Contributor Disclosure(s): M. Middeldorp

    • Nothing to disclose

    D. Slotwiner

    • Nothing to disclose

    A. Pina

    • Nothing to disclose

    Staff Disclosure(s) (note: HRS staff are NOT in control of educational content. Disclosures are provided solely for full transparency to the learner):

    S. Sailor: No relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies to disclose. M. Baldwin: No relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies to disclose.

    18 min
  5. The Lead Episode 171: A Discussion of the CMR Guide Trial

    Season 4, Episode 171

    Show notes

    Description:

    In this episode of The Lead, host Jason T. Jacobson, MD, FHRS, is joined by Sei Iwai, MD, FHRS, and Jeanne E. Poole, MD, FHRS, CCDS, to discuss "Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance to Guide Defibrillator Implantation for LVEF of 36% to 50%: The CMR GUIDE Randomized Clinical Trial." The panel examines the trial's findings on using cardiovascular magnetic resonance–identified myocardial scar to guide primary prevention ICD implantation, including limitations of the study and current approaches to sudden cardiac death risk stratification, as well as the potential role of more sophisticated, dynamic risk-prediction models.

    Learning Objectives:

    •

    Describe the design, patient population, primary outcome, and key findings of the CMR GUIDE randomized clinical trial.

    •

    Evaluate the limitations of using cardiovascular magnetic resonance–identified myocardial scar to guide primary prevention ICD implantation in patients with an LVEF of 36% to 50%.

    •

    Assess current challenges and emerging approaches to sudden cardiac death risk stratification, including the potential use of multimodal and dynamic risk-prediction models.

    Host: Jason T. Jacobson, MD, FHRS

    Guests: Sei Iwai, MD, FHRS and Jeanne E. Poole, MD, FHRS, CCDS

    Faculty Disclosures:

    J. Jacobson

    •

    Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: Zoll Medical Corporation, Vektor Medical, Inc., CardioFocus, Inc., Abbott Medical, Johnson and Johnson

    •

    Stock Options-Privately Held: Atlas 5D

    S. Iwai

    • Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: Alta Thera Pharmaceuticals, Biotronik, Johnson and Johnson, CardioFocus, Inc.

    J. Poole

    •

    Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: Heart Rhythm Society

    •

    Research (Contracted Grants): Boston Scientific, AtriCure, Inc., Kestra, Inc., Biotronik

    16 min
  6. The Lead Episode 170: A Discussion of Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Sham to Treat Atrial Fibrillation: The PFA-SHAM Randomized Clinical Trial

    Season 4, Episode 170

    Show notes

    In this episode of The Lead, host Cinzia Monaco, MD, PhD, is joined by Kinan Kneizeh, MD, and Konstantinos Vlachos, MD, PhD, to discuss "Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Sham to Treat Atrial Fibrillation: The PFA-SHAM Randomized Clinical Trial." The panel examines the trial's sham-controlled evidence for the effects of pulsed field ablation on atrial fibrillation recurrence, quality of life, AF burden, and psychological well-being, while considering placebo effects, study limitations, and the applicability of the findings to clinical practice.

    Learning Objectives: 1. Describe the design, patient population, endpoints, and key findings of the PFA-SHAM randomized clinical trial. 2. Evaluate the effects of pulsed field ablation compared with a sham procedure on atrial fibrillation recurrence, AF burden, quality of life, and psychological well-being. 3. Assess the trial's limitations, potential placebo effects, and applicability to the management of patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation.

    Host: Cinzia Monaco, MD, PhD

    Guests: Kinan Kneizeh, MD and Konstantinos Vlachos, MD, PhD

    Disclosures:

    C. Monaco • No relevant disclosures

    K. Kneizeh • No relevant disclosures

    K. Vlachos, MD, PhD • No relevant disclosures

    21 min
  7. The Lead Episode 169: A Discussion of Radiofrequency Ablation Produces Stiffer Atrial Lesions Than Pulse Field Ablation: In vivo and ex vivo magnetic resonance elastography in pigs

    Season 4, Episode 169

    Show notes

    In this episode of The Lead, host Deep Chandh Raja, MBBS, MD, PhD, FHRS, is joined by Kars Neven, MD, PhD, and David Chieng, MBBS, CCDS, to discuss the journal article, Radiofrequency Ablation Produces Stiffer Atrial Lesions Than Pulse Field Ablation: In vivo and ex vivo magnetic resonance elastography in pigs. Together, they discuss the study's comparison of atrial lesions produced by radiofrequency ablation and pulse field ablation using in vivo and ex vivo magnetic resonance elastography in pigs.

    Learning Objectives

    • Review the study's comparison of atrial lesions produced by radiofrequency ablation and pulse field ablation.
    • Discuss the use of in vivo and ex vivo magnetic resonance elastography to evaluate atrial lesions in pigs.
    • Examine the differences in atrial lesion stiffness observed following radiofrequency and pulse field ablation.

    Host: Deep Chandh Raja, MBBS, MD, PhD, FHRS

    Guests: Kars Neven, MD, PhD and David Chieng, MBBS, CCDS

    Disclosures:

    D. Raja

    • No relevant disclosures

    K. Neven

    • Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: Boston Scientific, Biosense Webster, Inc., Lifetech Scientific
    • Stock Options-Privately Held: Field Medical

    D. Chieng

    • No relevant disclosures

    18 min
  8. The Lead Episode 168: A Discussion of Weight Loss in Older Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, The LOSE-AF Randomized Clinical Trial

    Season 4, Episode 168

    Show notes

    Description:

    In this episode of The Lead, host Jenelle Dziano, PhD candidate, is joined by Roopinder Sandu, MD, MPH, FHRS and Louise Segan, MBBS, MPH, PhD to discuss the journal article, Weight Loss in Older Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, The LOSE-AF Randomized Clinical Trial. Together, they review the findings of the LOSE-AF randomized clinical trial examining weight loss in older patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

    Learning Objectives

    • Review the key findings of the LOSE-AF randomized clinical trial examining weight loss in older patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
    • Discuss the role of weight loss in the management of older patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
    • Examine the clinical implications of the study findings for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

    Host: Jenelle Dziano, PhD candidate

    Guests: Roopinder Sandu, MD, MPH, FHRS and Louise Segan, MBBS, MPH, PhD

    Disclosures:

    J. Dziano

    • No relevant disclosures

    R. Sandu

    • No relevant disclosures

    L. Segan

    • No relevant disclosures

    1 min
  9. The Lead Episode 167: A Discussion of The Long-Term Outcomes of Left Bundle-Branch Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing in Heart Failure (The HeartSync-LBBP Randomized Clinical Trial)

    Season 4, Episode 167

    Show notes

    In this episode of The Lead, host Deepak Pasupula, MD, MPH, FHRS, is joined by Zaniar Ghazizadeh, MD, and Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman, MD, FHRS, to discuss the journal article, The Long-Term Outcomes of Left Bundle-Branch Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing in Heart Failure (The HeartSync-LBBP Randomized Clinical Trial). Together, they review the long-term outcomes of left bundle-branch pacing compared with biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and discuss the findings of the HeartSync-LBBP randomized clinical trial.

    Learning Objectives

    • Review the long-term outcomes of left bundle-branch pacing compared with biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure.
    • Discuss the findings of the HeartSync-LBBP randomized clinical trial.
    • Examine the clinical implications of comparing left bundle-branch pacing with biventricular pacing in heart failure.

    Host: Deepak Pasupula, MD, MPH, FHRS

    Guests: Zaniar Ghazizadeh, MD and Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman, MD, FHRS

    Disclosures:

    D. Pasupula

    • No relevant disclosures

    Z. Ghazizadeh

    • No relevant disclosures

    P. Vijayaraman

    • Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Medtronic
    • Research: Medtronic
    • Fellowship Support: Medtronic

    34 min
  10. The Lead Episode 166: A Discussion of Relationship Between Time-to-First Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Recurrence and Atrial Fibrillation Burden: Implications for Trial Design

    Season 4, Episode 166

    Show notes

    In this episode of The Lead recorded at EHRA, host Christopher Kowalewski, MD, is joined by Tina Baykaner, MD, MPH, and Sanjiv M. Narayan, MD, PhD, FHRS, to discuss the journal article, Relationship Between Time-to-First Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Recurrence and Atrial Fibrillation Burden: Implications for Trial Design. Together, they examine the relationship between time to first atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and atrial fibrillation burden and discuss the implications of these measures for clinical trial design.

    Learning Objectives

    • Review the relationship between time-to-first atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and atrial fibrillation burden.
    • Discuss how different measures of atrial fibrillation recurrence and burden may influence the interpretation of clinical trial outcomes.
    • Examine the implications of atrial fibrillation burden and time-to-first recurrence for the design of future atrial fibrillation trials.

    Host: Christopher Kowalewski, MD

    Guests: Tina Baykaner, MD, MPH and Sanjiv M. Narayan, MD, PhD, FHRS

    Disclosures:

    C. Kowalewski

    • No relevant disclosures

    T. Baykaner

    • Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: Volta Medical, Medtronic, Pacemate, Johnson & Johnson, Abbott Medical, Boston Scientific
    • Research: NIH, Boston Scientific

    S. Narayan

    • Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: UpToDate, Inc, LifeSignals, Abbott Medical, TDK Inc.
    • Research: National Institutes for Health
    • Intellectual Property Rights: University of California Regents
    • Stocks – Privately Held: Physcade

    15 min
  11. The Lead Episode 165: A Discussion of Left Atrial Appendage Closure or Medical Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation (The CLOSURE-AF Trial)

    Season 4, Episode 165

    Show notes

    In this episode of The Lead recorded at HRS2026, host Danesh Kella, MBBS, FHRS is joined by Jeffrey S. Healey, MD, FHRS and Fred M. Kusumoto, MD, FHRS to discuss the journal article, Left Atrial Appendage Closure or Medical Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation (The CLOSURE-AF Trial). Together, they review the study findings comparing left atrial appendage closure with medical therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and discuss the potential implications for clinical practice.

    Learning Objectives

    • Review the design and key findings of the CLOSURE-AF Trial comparing left atrial appendage closure with medical therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation.
    • Discuss the comparative considerations of left atrial appendage closure and medical therapy for the management of atrial fibrillation.
    • Examine the potential clinical implications of the CLOSURE-AF Trial for treatment decision-making in patients with atrial fibrillation.

    Host: Danesh Kella, MBBS, FHRS

    Guests: Jeffrey S. Healey, MD, FHRS and Fred M. Kusumoto, MD, FHRS

    Disclosures:

    D. Kella

    • Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: Zoll Medical Corporation, MBW Spectrum

    J. Healey

    • Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: Boston Scientific, Servier
    • Research: Pfizer, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Inc.
    • Speakers' Bureau: Bristol-Myers Squibb

    F. Kusumoto

    • No relevant disclosures

    33 min
  12. The Lead Episode 164: A Discussion of Digital Twin–Guided Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia

    Season 4, Episode 164

    Show notes

    Recorded at HRS2026, this episode of The Lead features host Christopher Kowalewski, MD, in conversation with Junaid A.B. Zaman, MA, MD, PhD, CCDS, and Patrick Boyle, BS, PhD, FHRS, about the journal article, Digital Twin–Guided Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia. Together, they discuss the study's findings and explore the use of digital twin technology to guide ventricular tachycardia ablation and its potential implications for clinical electrophysiology.

    Learning Objectives

    • Review the design and key findings of the study evaluating digital twin–guided ablation for ventricular tachycardia.
    • Discuss the use of digital twin technology as a tool to guide ventricular tachycardia ablation.
    • Explore the potential clinical implications of digital twin–guided ablation for the management of ventricular tachycardia.

    Host: Christopher Kowalewski, MD

    Guests:

    Junaid A.B. Zaman, MA, MD, PhD, CCDS

    Patrick Boyle, BS, PhD, FHRS

    Disclosures:

    C. Kowalewski

    • No relevant disclosures

    J Zaman

    • Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: Acutus Medical Inc., Johnson and Johnson, American Medical Association, American College of Physicians, Bylis Medical Company
    • Office/Trustee/Director/Other Fiduciary Role: Society of Bedside Medicine
    • Travel/Entertainment: Boston Scientific

    P Boyle

    • Research: Seattle Foundation, Catherine Holmes Wilkins Charitable Foundation, NIH/NHLBI, American Heart Association
    • Other Non-Financial Relationship: Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology
    • Office/Trustee/Director/Other Fiduciary Role: The Cardiac Electrophysiology Society

    19 min
  13. The Lead Episode 163: A Discussion of Conduction System vs Biventricular Pacing in Heart Failure, The PhysioSync-HF Randomized Clinical Trial

    Season 4, Episode 163

    Show notes

    Recorded at EHRA 2026, this episode of The Lead features host Melissa Middeldorp, MPH, PhD, FHRS, in conversation with Sana Al-Khatib, MD, MHS, FHRS, and Wei Hua, MD, FHRS, about the journal article, Conduction System vs Biventricular Pacing in Heart Failure: The PhysioSync-HF Randomized Clinical Trial. Together, they discuss the findings of the PhysioSync-HF randomized clinical trial, comparing conduction system pacing with biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and exploring the potential implications for clinical practice.

    Learning Objectives:

    • Review the design and key findings of the PhysioSync-HF randomized clinical trial comparing conduction system pacing and biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure.
    • Discuss the differences between conduction system pacing and biventricular pacing as evaluated in the PhysioSync-HF trial.
    • Examine the potential clinical implications of the trial findings for pacing strategies in patients with heart failure.

    Host: Melissa Middeldorp, MPH, PhD, FHRS

    Guests: Sana Al-Khatib, MD, MHS, FHRS and Wei Hua, MD, FHRS

    Disclosures:

    M. Middeldorp

    · No relevant disclosures

    S. Al-Khatib

    · Other Financial Relationship: American Heart Association

    W. Hua

    · No relevant disclosures

    13 min
  14. The Lead Episode 162: A Discussion of Atrial Fibrillation Screening According to Genetic Risk: A Secondary Analysis of the Randomized LOOP Study

    Season 4, Episode 162

    Show notes

    In this episode of The Lead, host Tina Baykaner, MD, MPH, is joined by Christopher Kowalewski, MD, and Marco Perez, MD, to discuss the journal article, Atrial Fibrillation Screening According to Genetic Risk: A Secondary Analysis of the Randomized LOOP Study. Together, they review findings from this secondary analysis of the LOOP Study and explore the relationship between genetic risk and atrial fibrillation screening.

    Learning Objectives

    • Review the key findings from the secondary analysis of the randomized LOOP Study examining atrial fibrillation screening according to genetic risk.
    • Discuss the relationship between genetic risk and atrial fibrillation screening as evaluated in the study.
    • Explore the potential implications of incorporating genetic risk into atrial fibrillation screening strategies.

    Host: Tina Baykaner, MD, MPH

    Guests: Christopher Kowalewski, MD and Marco Perez, MD

    Disclosures:

    T. Baykaner

    • Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: Volta Medical, Medtronic, Pacemate, Johnson & Johnson, Abbott Medical, Boston Scientific
    • Research: NIH, Boston Scientific

    C. Kowalewski

    • No relevant disclosures

    M. Perez

    • Ownership/Partnership/Principal: QALY
    • Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: Boston Scientific, Biotronik
    • Research: Apple, Inc.
    • Other/Stock Options Privately Held

    23 min
  15. The Lead Episode 161: A Discussion of 20 Years: Clinical Outcome After Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With Symptomatic Drug-Refractory Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

    Season 4, Episode 161

    Show notes

    Recorded at EHRA 2026, this episode of The Lead features host Christopher Kowalewski, MD, in conversation with Christian Sohns, MD, and Pierre Jaïs, MD, about the journal article, 20 Years: Clinical Outcome After Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With Symptomatic Drug-Refractory Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. Together, they discuss the study's long-term clinical outcomes following pulmonary vein isolation in patients with symptomatic drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and explore the implications of two decades of follow-up.

    Learning Objectives:

    • Review the long-term clinical outcomes reported after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with symptomatic drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
    • Discuss the implications of 20-year follow-up data for the treatment of patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation.
    • Examine how long-term outcome data may inform clinical decision-making for catheter ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

    Host: Christopher Kowalewski, MD

    Guests: Christian Sohns, MD and Pierre Jaïs, MD

    Disclosures:

    C. Kowalewski

    • No relevant disclosures

    C. Sohns

    • No relevant disclosures

    P. Jaïs

    • Ownership/Partnership/Prinicipal: inHEART
    • Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: Biosense Webster, Inc., Boston Scientific, Medtronic

    23 min
  16. Episode 160: A Discussion of Real-time smartphone alerts during atrial fibrillation episodes with implantable cardiac monitors and wearable devices: SMART-ALERT study

    Season 4, Episode 160

    Show notes

    Recorded at EHRA 2026, this episode of The Lead features host Michael S. Lloyd, MD, FHRS, in conversation with Tina Baykaner, MD, MPH, and Kenneth Ellenbogen, MD, FHRS, about the journal article, Real-time smartphone alerts during atrial fibrillation episodes with implantable cardiac monitors and wearable devices: SMART-ALERT study. Together, they discuss the study findings and explore the use of real-time smartphone alerts in conjunction with implantable cardiac monitors and wearable devices during atrial fibrillation episodes.

    Learning Objectives

    • Review the design and key findings of the SMART-ALERT study evaluating real-time smartphone alerts during atrial fibrillation episodes.
    • Discuss the use of implantable cardiac monitors and wearable devices for real-time detection and notification of atrial fibrillation episodes.
    • Explore the potential clinical implications of integrating smartphone alerts with cardiac monitoring technologies.

    Host: Michael S. Lloyd, MD, FHRS

    Guests: Tina Baykaner, MD, MPH

    Kenneth A. Ellenbogen, MD, FHRS

    Disclosures:

    M. Lloyd

    · Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Other

    T. Baykaner

    · Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: Volta Medical, Medtronic, Pacemate, Johnson & Johnson, Abbott Medical, Boston Scientific

    · Research: NIH, Boston Scientific

    K. Ellenbogen

    · Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: American College of Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Inc., Abbott

    · Royalty Income: Wiley-Blackwell, Elsevier

    14 min
  17. The Lead Episode 159: A Discussion of Atrial Mechanical Contraction Predicts Cerebrovascular Risk in Patients With Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy and Sinus Rhythm

    Season 4, Episode 159

    Show notes

    Recorded at EHRA 2026, this episode of The Lead features host Michael S. Lloyd, MD, FHRS, in conversation with Tina Baykaner, MD, MPH, and Prashanthan Sanders, MBBS, PhD, FHRS, about the journal article, Atrial Mechanical Contraction Predicts Cerebrovascular Risk in Patients With Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy and Sinus Rhythm. Together, they discuss the study findings and explore the relationship between atrial mechanical contraction and cerebrovascular risk in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy who are in sinus rhythm.

    Learning Objectives:

    • Review the key findings of the study examining atrial mechanical contraction and cerebrovascular risk in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy and sinus rhythm.
    • Discuss the association between atrial mechanical contraction and cerebrovascular risk in this patient population.
    • Explore the potential clinical implications of assessing atrial mechanical function in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy.

    Host: Michael S. Lloyd, MD, FHRS

    Guests:

    Tina Baykaner, MD, MPH

    Prashanthan Sanders, MBBS, PhD, FHRS

    Disclosures:

    M. Lloyd

    • Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Other

    T. Baykaner

    • Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: Volta Medical, Medtronic, Pacemate, Johnson & Johnson, Abbott Medical, Boston Scientific
    • Research: NIH, Boston Scientific

    P. Sanders

    • Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: Boston Scientific, Abbott Medical
    • Other Financial Relationships: Medtronic PLC, Pacemate, CathRx
    • Research: Abbott, Becton Dickinson, Calyan Technologies, Ceryx Medical, Biosense Webster, CathRx, HelloAlfred, Medtronic, Inc., Abbott Medical

    15 min
  18. The Lead Episode 158: A Discussion of Device-Related Complications in Transvenous Versus Subcutaneous Defibrillator Therapy During Long-Term Follow-Up: The PRAETORIAN-XL Trial

    Season 4, Episode 158

    Show notes

    In this episode of The Lead, host Robert Schaller, DO, FHRS, is joined by Tina Baykaner, MD, MPH, and Maulin Shah, MD, to discuss the journal article, Device-Related Complications in Transvenous Versus Subcutaneous Defibrillator Therapy During Long-Term Follow-Up: The PRAETORIAN-XL Trial. Together, they review the study's long-term follow-up findings and explore device-related complications associated with transvenous and subcutaneous defibrillator therapy.

    Learning Objectives:

    • Review the long-term follow-up results of the PRAETORIAN-XL Trial comparing transvenous and subcutaneous defibrillator therapy.
    • Discuss device-related complications associated with transvenous and subcutaneous implantable defibrillator systems.
    • Examine the clinical considerations of defibrillator therapy selection based on long-term device-related outcomes.

    Host: Robert Schaller, DO, FHRS

    Guests: Tina Baykaner, MD, MPH and Maulin Shah, MD

    Disclosures:

    R. Schaller

    • Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: Philips, Abbott Medical
    • Officer/Trustee/Director/Committee Chair/Other Fiduciary Role: Imricor
    • Other Financial Relationship: Other

    T. Baykaner

    • Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: Volta Medical, Medtronic, Pacemate, Johnson & Johnson, Abbott Medical, Boston Scientific
    • Research: NIH, Boston Scientific

    M Shah

    • No relevant disclosures

    28 min
  19. The Lead Episode 157: A Discussion of Predicting Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients With Sarcoidosis Using a Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Model

    Season 4, Episode 157

    Show notes

    In this episode of The Lead, host Sandeep A. Saha, MD, MS, FHRS, is joined by Suraj Kapa, MD, FHRS, and Albert Joseph Rogers, BSE, MBA, MD, FHRS, to discuss the journal article, Predicting Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients With Sarcoidosis Using a Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Model. Together, they review the study's approach to using a multimodal artificial intelligence model to predict sudden cardiac death risk in patients with sarcoidosis and discuss the potential implications of these findings.

    Learning Objectives

    • Review the methodology and key findings of a multimodal artificial intelligence model developed to predict sudden cardiac death in patients with sarcoidosis.
    • Discuss the potential role of artificial intelligence–based risk prediction in the evaluation of patients with sarcoidosis.
    • Examine the clinical implications of sudden cardiac death risk stratification in this patient population.

    Host: Sandeep A Saha, MD, MS, FHRS

    Guests: Suraj Kapa, MD, FHRS and Albert Joseph Rogers, BSE, MBA, MD, FHRS

    Disclosures:

    Sandeep A Saha, MD, MS, FHRS

    • Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee/Speaker's Bureau: Medtronic, Inc.

    Suraj Kapa, MD, FHRS

    • Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: Abbott

    • Stock Options: Nanowear Inc.

    • Other Non-Financial Relationships: Biosense Webster, Inc., Boston Scientific

    Albert Joseph Rogers, BSE, MBA, MD, FHRS

    • Research: National Institutes of Heath, American Heart Association

    • Ownership/Partnership: WearLinq, Inc.

    • Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee: Other

    29 min
  20. The Lead Episode 156: A Discussion of The Association Between Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Quality of Life: A Substudy of the SHAM-PVI Trial

    Season 4, Episode 156

    Show notes

    In this episode of The Lead, host Christopher Kowalewski, MD, is joined by John M. Mandrola, MD, and Nassir F. Marrouche, MD, FHRS, to discuss the journal article, The Association Between Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Quality of Life: A Substudy of the SHAM-PVI Trial. Together, they explore the relationship between atrial fibrillation burden and quality of life, reviewing findings from this substudy of the SHAM-PVI Trial and discussing their relevance to patient-centered outcomes.

    Learning Objectives

    • Review the key findings from the SHAM-PVI Trial substudy examining the association between atrial fibrillation burden and quality of life.
    • Discuss the relationship between atrial fibrillation burden and patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes.
    • Explore the implications of assessing both arrhythmia burden and quality of life when evaluating treatment outcomes in atrial fibrillation.

    Host: Christopher Kowalewski, MD

    Guests: John M. Mandrola, MD and Nassir F. Marrouche, MD, FHRS

    Disclosures:

    Christopher Kowalewski, MD

    No relevant disclosures

    John M. Mandrola, MD

    No relevant disclosures

    Nassir F. Marrouche, MD, FHRS

    • Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting Fee/Speaker's Bureau: Biosense Webster, Inc., Boston Scientific, AtriCure, Inc., Abbott, Sanofi

    • Research: Abbott, Biosense Webster, Inc., Medtronic, Siemens, General Electric, Boston Scientific, Sanofi, Samsung

    16 min

On these lists

The Lead Podcast presented by Heart Rhythm Society is one of the shows picked out on this list

All Education lists